Baseball to Face But Sadly No Case

Sketch of stick figure dizzy after baseball hit

BaseballIn Cocco v. City of New York, the Appellate Division, First Department yesterday affirmed the dismissal of a personal injury lawsuit arising from an errant baseball striking the plaintiff.

“[P]laintiff alleges that she was walking on the sidewalk, heading south on Lexington Avenue between 96th and 95th Streets, when a baseball coming from a schoolyard, owned and maintained by defendants, struck her in the face.”

The appellate court held that the trial court properly granted summary judgment to defendants:

Defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that they neither owed nor violated a duty of care to plaintiff. Even accepting plaintiff’s allegations and testimony as true, defendants, as the proprietor[s] of a ball park need only provide screening for the area of the field behind home plate where the danger of being struck by a ball is the greatest. Accordingly, defendants cannot be held liable for the injuries suffered by plaintiff who was struck by a baseball while walking on a sidewalk adjacent to a school yard that contained a ball field.

It also held that plaintiff failed to demonstrate that further discovery was necessary for her to properly respond to defendant’s motion.

Share This:
© 2026 Pospis Law, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.