Pleading

by

In Silvers v Jamaica Hospital, No. 2021-00446, 620936/19, 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 03938, 2023 WL 4751994 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., July 26, 2023), the court reversed a lower court determination dismissing plaintiff’s claims of sex discrimination asserted under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. The court summarized plaintiff’s discrimination claims as follows: The…

Read More Sex Discrimination Claims Sufficiently Alleged Against Jamaica Hospital
Share This:
by

In Broadway v. University of Maryland, Global Campus, 2023 WL 4421406 (D.Md. July 7, 2023), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim. This decision, like many others, illustrates the application of the “severe or pervasive” standard to such claims. The court explained: Plaintiff generally asserts that her immediate…

Read More Hostile Work Environment Claims Dismissed; Generalized Assertions of Harasment and Bullying Insufficient
Share This:
by

In McIntosh v City of New York, No. 505675/2022, 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 50761(U), 2023 WL 4753854 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Kings Cty. July 10, 2023), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s hostile work environment claims asserted under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. This decision operates as a…

Read More Hostile Work Environment Claims Dismissed Against the City of New York
Share This:
by

In Pinkcombe v. Randev, No. 155804/2022, 2023 WL 4680147 (N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County July 20, 2023), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims that he was subjected to discrimination (based on his gender and race) in a place of public accommodation. From the decision: In relevant part, Administrative Code…

Read More Public Accommodation Discrimination Claims Sufficiently Alleged Against Medical Office
Share This:
by

In Brown v. Port Authority Transit Corporation, et al, Civil Action No. 22-3199, 2023 WL 4747678 (E.D.Pa. July 24, 2023), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s race-based hostile work environment claim asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The court summarized the elements of such a claim in the Third Circuit, namely:…

Read More “Work Ethic” Comment Did Not Support Race-Based Hostile Work Environment Claim
Share This:
by

In T.D.H. v. Kazi Foods of New Jersey, Inc., Civil No. 5:23-cv-00634-JMG, 2023 WL 4567722 (E.D.Pa. July 17, 2023), the court, inter alia, held that plaintiff sufficiently alleged a hostile work environment sexual harassment claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: To state a Title VII claim for…

Read More Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claim Sufficiently Alleged; Contentions Include Comments That Go Beyond “Occasional Offhand Comments”
Share This:
by

In Steiner v. Giant of Maryland, LLC, 2023 WL 4421373 (D.Del. July 10, 2023), the court dismissed plaintiff’s hostile work environment sexual harassment claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: In reviewing a hostile work environment claim, the Court must look to the totality of the circumstances…

Read More Recent Decision Illustrates Demanding Standard for Proving a Title VII Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claim
Share This:
by

In EEOC v. 98 Starr Road Operating Co., LLC, 2023 WL 4557751 (D.Vt. July 17, 2023), the court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ race-based hostile work environment claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In this case, the complaint alleges repeated incidents of racial insults (including the “n-word”), physical…

Read More Title VII Race-Based Hostile Work Environment Claim, Arising From Patient Conduct, Survives Dismissal
Share This:
by

In Reed v. Fortive Corporation et al, 2023 WL 4457908 (W.D.N.Y. July 11, 2023), the court, inter alia, dismissed plaintiff’s “quid pro quo” sexual harassment claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: Here, Plaintiff alleges that her quid pro quo claim arises from her denial of McCauley’s…

Read More Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment Claim Dismissed as Insufficiently Alleged
Share This:
by

In Hewitt v. Stephens et al, 2:22-cv-00388, 2023 WL 4494457 (S.D.W.Va. July 12, 2023), the court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s sex-based hostile work environment claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court explained that, to state a hostile work environment claim for sex discrimination, a plaintiff must…

Read More Sex-Based Hostile Work Environment Claim Sufficiently Alleged; Allegations Included Speculation About Intimate Involvement With Co-Worker
Share This: