In Carrillo v. Empire Hotel Services LLC d/b/a Canopy by Hilton Jersey City Arts District et al, No. 2:22-CV-03273, 2023 WL 3993767 (D.N.J. June 14, 2023), the court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims of hostile work environment sexual harassment asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New…
Read More Sex-Based Hostile Work Environment Claim Survives DismissalIn Kocher v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Civil Action No. 22-3808, 2023 WL 3689702 (E.D.Pa. May 26, 2023), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s retaliation claims asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. the court held that…
Read More Retaliation Claim, Based on Adverse Actions Following Filing of EEO Complaint, Sufficiently AllegedIn Bobowicz v. Holy Name Medical Center, Inc., 2023 WL 2579058 (N.J.Super.A.D. March 21, 2023), the court affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff’s sexual harassment claim. From the decision: Plaintiffs assert this case is subject to the Lehmann standard, which concerns sexual harassment that creates a hostile work environment. Lehmann v. Toys ‘R’ Us, Inc., 132…
Read More Sexual Harassment Claim Properly Dismissed in Light of Consensual Nature of Relationship, Court HoldsIn Loth v. City of New York, No. 160925/2021, 2023 WL 3456623 (N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County May 15, 2023), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s gender-based discrimination claims asserted under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. From the decision: At this early stage of the litigation,…
Read More Sex/Gender Discrimination Claims Sufficiently Alleged; Comments Included “Calendar Girl” RemarkIn Harvison v. G.A. West & Co., Inc., 2023 WL 2998482, at *5 (S.D.Miss. April 18, 2023), the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, inter alia, granted one plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint to assert a “quid pro quo” sexual harassment claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act…
Read More Title VII “Quid Pro Quo” Sexual Harassment Claim, With Amendment, Plausibly AllegedIn Colavecchia v. South Side Area School District, 2023 WL 3043777 (W.D.Pa. April 21, 2023), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s hostile work environment sexual harassment claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: Under the first prong, a court may conclude that sexual…
Read More Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claim Survives Dismissal; Allegations Included Repeated Sexual CommentsIn Bond v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, No. 160658/13, 2022-00688, 35, 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 01939, 2023 WL 2919893 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. Apr. 13, 2023), the court, inter alia, affirmed the lower court’s denial of of defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s hostile work environment/sexual harassment claim under the New York…
Read More Hostile Work Environment/Sexual Harassment Claim Survives Summary Judgment; Evidence Included Criticism Following Rejection of Sexual AdvancesIn Watkins v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 2023 WL 2734324 (D.D.C. March 31, 2023), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s gender-based hostile work environment claim. From the decision: Watkins first alleges a hostile work environment based on gender. Watkins 1, Compl. ¶ 58. WMATA argues that she does not allege…
Read More Gender-Based Hostile Work Environment Claim Survives Dismissal; Allegations Included Supervisor’s Repeated Use of the Word “Bitch”In Williams v. Genmill LLC, No. 652706/2020, 2023 WL 2650427, 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 30942(U) (N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County Mar. 27, 2023), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim of gender discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law. The plaintiff here alleged, among other things, that defendant…
Read More Absence of Employer/Employee Relationship Dooms NYS Human Rights Law Gender Discrimination ClaimOn March 3, 2022, President Biden signed into law the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021, codified at 9 U.S.C. § 402 (EFAA). This law, in sum, invalidates any pre-dispute mandatory arbitration clause as it applies to plaintiffs alleging claims of or related to workplace sexual harassment. In a recent…
Read More Court Considers Temporal Applicability of the “Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021”