Sex / Gender Discrimination

by

The “Jerk Boss” is a stock character of the American workplace; one would be hard-pressed to find someone who has not experienced (or a work-centric fictional setting that does not include at least) one. And what is more indicative of a “hostile” workplace than a boss who loudly uses profanity and insulting language at work? Such…

Read More Sex-Based Hostile Work Environment Claim Dismissed; Alleged Profane, Insulting Language Insufficient
Share This:
by

In Miro v. City of Bridgeport, No. 3:20CV00346(SALM), 2022 WL 3284400 (D.Conn. Aug. 11, 2022), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims of sexual harassment – alleged under the rubric of “hostile work environment” and “quid pro quo” theories – in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of…

Read More Hostile Work Environment and Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment Claims Survive Dismissal
Share This:
by

In Syeed et al v. Bloomberg L.P., 1:20-cv-7464-GHW, 2022 WL 3447987 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2022), the court, inter alia, denied (in part) defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims of retaliation asserted under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws.[1]The court dismissed plaintiff’s claims asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of…

Read More Retaliation Claims Sufficiently Alleged, in Part, Against Bloomberg L.P.
Share This:
by

In Steinberg v. Capgemini America, Inc., 2022 WL 3371323 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 16, 2022), the court granted defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and dismiss plaintiff’s complaint alleging sexual harassment, in light of an arbitration agreement between the parties. The crux of the parties’ dispute was the applicability of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claims Against Capgemini Must Be Resolved in Arbitration; Arbitration-Limiting Statute Inapplicable
Share This:
by

In Strobel v. Westfield State University, No. 3:21-cv-30074-KAR, 2022 WL 3214965 (D.Mass. August 9, 2022), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s hostile work environment sexual harassment claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In sum, plaintiff, who was employed by defendant as a maintainer, alleged that…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claim, Including Alleged Buttocks-Grabbing, Sufficiently Alleged
Share This:
by

In Doe v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections et al, No. 4:19-CV-01584, 2022 WL 3219952 (M.D.Pa. Aug. 9, 2022), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s gender-based hostile work environment and constructive discharge claims asserted under the Equal Protection Clause. As to plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim, the court explained: Here,…

Read More Sex-Based Hostile Work Environment and Constructive Discharge Claims, Asserted Under the Equal Protection Clause, Survive Summary Judgment
Share This:
by

In Frehoo, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 510 P.3d 888, 901, 319 Or. App. 548 (Or. App. May 18, 2022), the Court of Appeals of Oregon held that the evidence supported the conclusion by Oregon’s Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) that an adult-entertainment establishment subjected an underage dancer to hostile work environment…

Read More Underage Exotic Dancer & Trafficking Victim Was Subject to Sexual Harassment, Court Holds
Share This:
by

In Gray v. Koch Foods, Inc. et al, 2022 WL 141533 (M.D.Ala. Jan. 14, 2022), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim of hostile work environment sexual harassment asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: The facts at issue here do not…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claim Survives Summary Judgment; Conduct Was Sufficiently “Severe” Even if Not “Pervasive”
Share This:
by

In Delagrange v. Weaver Popcorn Manufacturing, Inc., 1:20-CV-451-HAB, 2022 WL 3081978 (N.D.Ind. Aug. 3, 2022), the court, inter alia, dismissed plaintiff’s same-sex sexual harassment claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court summarized the black-letter law on this issue, arising from U.S. Supreme Court precedent, as follows: Same-sex harassment…

Read More Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Claim Dismissed
Share This:
by

In Doe v. Benjamin Zaremski M.D., P.C. et al, 21 Civ. 3187 (ER), 2022 WL 2966041 (S.D.N.Y. July 27, 2022), the court held that the applicable standard for making our a claim under the New York City Human Rights Law’s “public accommodation discrimination” provision, N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107(4), is that the aggrieved person was…

Read More Court Broadly Interprets the NYC Human Rights Law’s Public Accommodation Discrimination Provisoin
Share This: