Adverse Employment Action

by

In Sol Back v. Bank Hapoalim, B.M., Gil Karni, 2024 WL 4746263 (2d Cir. Nov. 12, 2024), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a lower court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s claim of sex-based discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The district court held that plaintiff did not…

Read More Applying New “Adverse Employment Action” Standard, 2d Circuit Vacates Dismissal of Title VII Sex-Discrimination Claims
Share This:
by

In Byrd v. Becerra, Civil Action No. 22-3746 (TSC), 2024 WL 4591438 (D.D.C. Oct. 28, 2024), the court, inter alia, held that plaintiff sufficiently alleged employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As to the “inference of discrimination” element, the court explained: Plaintiff has also pleaded an inference of discrimination…

Read More Title VII Race Discrimination Claim Survives Dismissal; Allegations Included Reassignment of Work to White Colleagues
Share This:
by

In Sargent v. Amazon.com, Inc., Civil Action No. 23-1330-RGA, 2024 WL 3936490 (D.Del. Aug. 26, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s race- and sex-based discrimination claims asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: Plaintiff alleges Defendants discriminated against him based on race and…

Read More Race and Sex Discrimination Claims Sufficiently Alleged Against Amazon; Assignment to Custodial Duties Was an “Adverse Employment Action”
Share This:
by

In Moy v. Napoli Shkolnik, PLLC et al, 2024 WL 3498131 (S.D.N.Y. July 22, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s – a Chinese American woman – claim of employment discrimination asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (as well as under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws). After…

Read More Chinese American Attorney Sufficiently Alleges Race, Gender Discrimination, Court Holds
Share This:
by

In Elgalad v. New York City Department of Education, et al., 2024 WL 621617 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment on his retaliation claims asserted under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. After summarizing the “black letter” law as to this claim, the court…

Read More Teacher’s Retaliation Claims Survive Summary Judgment, in Part
Share This:
by

In Olson v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al, Case No. 8:23-cv-590-TPB-CPT, 2024 WL 245978 (M.D.Fla. Jan. 23, 2024), the court (inter alia) denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims of race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act. From the decision: It is true…

Read More Title VII Race Discrimination Claim Survives Dismissal; Discovery Required to Determine Viability of Plaintiff’s Proffered Comparator
Share This:
by

In Jenes v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, SA-22-CV-00740-OLG, 2023 WL 8582600 (W.D.Tex. Dec. 11, 2023), the court, inter alia, held that plaintiff sufficiently alleged claims of discrimination based on sex (female) and national origin (Russian) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: Plaintiff has adequately pleaded an adverse employment…

Read More Title VII Discrimination Claims, Based on Sex and National Origin (Russian), Survives Dismissal, Court Rules
Share This:
by

In Milien v. City of New York et al, 20-CV-480 (MKB), 2023 WL 6050119 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 15, 2023), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s race discrimination claims, predicated on the alleged denial of overtime opportunities. As to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the court explained:…

Read More Race Discrimination Claims, Based on Alleged Overtime Denial, Survive Summary Judgment
Share This:
by

In Hafizov v. BDO USA, LLP, 22-CV-8853 (JPC) (RWL), 2023 WL 4697312 (S.D.N.Y. July 24, 2023), the court denied plaintiff’s motion to amend their complaint to add a retaliation claim. In a somewhat unique fact pattern, plaintiff alleges retaliation in the form of a deficiency letter sent by defendants’ counsel: Plaintiff’s proposed additional amendment seeks…

Read More Attorney Deficiency Letter Did Not Constitute an “Adverse Employment” Action
Share This:
by

A recent decision, McCallum v. Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 21-1911 (ABJ), 2023 WL 2571757 (D.D.C. March 20, 2023), the court addressed an issue that is central to many, if not most, allegations of employment discrimination: namely, whether an alleged negative action by an employer constitutes an actionable “adverse…

Read More Removal/Reassignment of Duties Was an “Adverse Employment Action”, Court Holds
Share This: