In Rojo v. Lakeview Sec. & Investigations, Inc., No. 24-CV-5729 (JPO), 2026 WL 83909 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2026), the court granted plaintiff’s motion for default judgment on her sex discrimination claims under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. From the decision: A party’s default is deemed to constitute a concession of all…
Read More Default Judgment on NYSHRL and NYCHRL Sex Discrimination Claims AwardedIn Lindsey v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., No. 23-CV-10166 (ALC)(SN), 2026 WL 63219 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2026), in which plaintiff alleges claims of hostile work environment, gender discrimination, sexual assault, and retaliation, the court ruled on defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to produce documents in response to various discovery requests. One issue addressed by the…
Read More Court Denies Motion to Compel Disclosure of Romantic Relationships in Sexual Harassment CaseIn Ramirez v. City of New York, No. 24-CV-1061 (AS), 2026 WL 18678 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2026), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s retaliation (but not disability discrimination) claim under the Rehabilitation Act. From the decision: The test for retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act has four parts: (1) the…
Read More Retaliation Claim, Based on Denial of Accommodations Following Filing of Lawsuit, Survives Summary JudgmentIn Mera et al v. SA Hospitality Group, LLC et al, No. 23 CIV. 3492 (PGG) (SDA), 2025 WL 3202080 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2025) – in which plaintiff asserts claims of hostile work environment sexual harassment under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, as well as wage & hour violations under the…
Read More EFAA Applies to Entire Case, Including Wage & Hour Claims; Motion to Compel Arbitration of FLSA & NYLL Claims ReversedIn Paige v. Garvan’s Rock and Rye, LLC, Maggie Mae’s, LLC, & Garvan McCloskey, No. 24CV3189 (DLC), 2025 WL 3201762 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2025), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s disability discrimination claims asserted under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the New York State Human Rights Law. From…
Read More Disability Discrimination Claims, Arising From Termination Following Workers Compensation Leave, Survive Summary JudgmentIn a recent decision, Aubrey Drake Graham v. UMG Recordings, 25-CV-0399 (JAV), 2025 WL 287960 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 9, 2025), the court, inter alia, dismissed rapper Drake’s complaint alleging defamation, arising from a lyric in a song (“Not Like Us”) accusing Drake of being a pedophile. Ultimately, the court ruled that the statement was nonactionable opinion.…
Read More Drake’s Defamation Complaint Dismissed; “Not Like Us” Statements Were Nonactionable OpinionIn Singh v. Accutime Watch Corp., 24-CV-8007 (JPO), 2025 WL 2916135 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2025), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint asserting a hostile work environment claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York…
Read More National Origin, Religion-Based Hostile Work Environment Claims, Based on “Disproportionate Workload”, DismissedIn Izuogu v. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, New York, 24 Civ. 4329 (DEH), 2025 WL 2806683 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2025), the court, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s hostile work environment claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981. From the decision: To establish…
Read More Hostile Work Environment Claims Dismissed; Remarks, Gossip, False Complaint Did Not Reference Race or National OriginIn Lindsey v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., 1:23-cv-10166-ALC, 2025 WL 2781281 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2025), the court discussed and applied the “continuing violation” doctrine under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In sum, plaintiff alleges that she was subjected to a hostile work environment, commencing in 2007 with an alleged sexual assault,…
Read More Title VII Hostile Work Environment Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss; Applicability of “Continuing Violation” Doctrine Must Await Further Factual DevelopmentIn Smith v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 24 Civ. 4633 (JPC), 2025 WL 2782484 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2025), the court held that a party invoking the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (EFAA) must actually allege facts that constitute sexual harassment. Here, the plaintiff did not: To determine whether this…
Read More Non-Sexual Gender Discrimination Did Not Trigger EFAA’s Arbitration Bar