FRE 404(b)

Person in suit with rainbow bow tie Person in suit with rainbow bow tie

In a recent case, Rudolph v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No.: 3:18-cv-6071-PGS-TJB, 2023 WL 5638844 (D.N.J. August 31, 2023), the court denied defendant’s motion in limine seeking to prelude plaintiff from introducing evidence of other employees’ allegations of discrimination. This evidence, typically referred to as “me too” evidence, can be very useful in a discrimination…

Read More “Me Too” Evidence Permitted in Discrimination Case
Share This:

Pospis Law PLLC logo with phone number Pospis Law PLLC logo with phone number

In Roberts v. Tim Dahle Imports, Inc., 2022 WL 1773036 (D.Utah June 1, 2022), an employment discrimination case, the court granted defendant’s motion in limine to exclude evidence in the form of an EEOC Consent Decree. From the decision: Plaintiff offers the 2009 consent decree for a proper purpose to prove intent and motive to…

Read More EEOC Consent Decree Excluded From Evidence
Share This:

Green stylized PL monogram logo Green stylized PL monogram logo

A recent decision, Boyce v. Bruce Weber and Little Bear, Inc., 19-cv-3825, 2021 WL 2821154 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 2021), is instructive as to how courts resolve evidentiary issues arising in the context of sexual harassment claims. In this case, plaintiff (a fashion model) asserts claims for sexual harassment against defendant Weber (a fashion photographer) under…

Read More Court Rules on “Modus Operandi” Witnesses in Bruce Weber Sexual Harassment Case
Share This:
© 2026 Pospis Law, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.