Sex / Gender Discrimination

by

In Joseph v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, 2024 WL 4705544 (11th Cir. Nov. 7, 2024), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 does not create an implied right of action for sex discrimination in employment. From the decision:…

Read More Title IX Does Not Create an Implied Right of Action for Sex-Based Employment Discrimination, Eleventh Circuit Holds
Share This:
by

In Frey v. Northern Soy, Inc. et al, Case # 23-CV-6198-FPG, 2024 WL 4373767 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s retaliation claims. From the decision: Title VII, NYSHRL, and ADA Retaliation Claims Plaintiff alleges that her termination was retaliation for her complaints about sex and disability discrimination,…

Read More Retaliation Claims Sufficiently Alleged; Termination Closely Followed Complaints of Sex and Disability Discrimination
Share This:
by

In Cordaro v. Lloyd J. Austin III, 6:22-CV-06027 EAW, 2024 WL 4248965 (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 2024), the court denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s disability discrimination claims, on the ground that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. From the decision: Plaintiff argues that because more men than women have…

Read More Gender Discrimination Claim Was Not “Administratively Exhausted”
Share This:
by

In Golubovych v. Saks 5th Avenue, Inc., 1:22-cv-9923-MKV, 2024 WL 4135251 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 10, 2024), the court, inter alia, dismissed plaintiff’s claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, on the ground that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies at the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. From the decision: Saks next argues…

Read More Title VII Claim Dismissed Due to Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies
Share This:
by

In Cali v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, 22-CV-942S, 2024 WL 3877393 (W.D.N.Y. August 20, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s hostile work environment sexual harassment claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: Isolated incidents of harassment ordinarily do…

Read More Title VII Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claim, Based on Attempted Kiss, Survives Dismissal
Share This:
by

In Delaney v. New York City Health & Hosps., 2024 NY Slip Op 32769(U), Index No. 525072/2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Kings Cty. August 2, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims of gender and race discrimination asserted under the New York State Human Rights Law. Plaintiff’s allegations included the following:…

Read More Race, Sex Discrimination Claims Sufficiently Alleged Against NYC Health & Hospitals
Share This:
by

In DiLeo v. McDonough, Case No. 19-CV-2405 (FB) (MMH), 2024 WL 3758808 (E.D.N.Y. August 12, 2024), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim of gender discrimination asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: The familiar, three-part McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework governs Plaintiff’s…

Read More “Emotionally Taxing” Work Environment Nevertheless Did Not Give Rise to Title VII Sex Discrimination Claim
Share This:
by

In Espinoza v. CGJC Holdings LLC d/b/a Joe and Pat’s Pizzeria and Restaurant et al, 23cv9133 (DLC), 2024 WL 3520662 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s retaliation claims asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the New York State and City Human…

Read More Retaliation Claims, Predicated on Sexual Harassment Complaint, Survive Dismissal
Share This:
by

In Wickland v. Archcare at Terrance Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center et al, 2024 WL 3432029 (E.D.N.Y. July 15, 2024), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim of sex discrimination (termination) asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court summarized the law, and applied it to…

Read More Title VII Sex Discrimination Claim Dismissed; Termination Was Allegedly Due to “No Call No Show” and Not Plaintiff’s Sex
Share This:
by

In Riggs v. Akamai Technologies et al, No. 1:23-CV-06463-LTS, 2024 WL 3347032 (S.D.N.Y. July 8, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss, and held that plaintiff sufficiently alleged, a hostile work environment sexual harassment claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State and City…

Read More Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claims Survive Dismissal; Allegations Included Sex Stereotyping and Comments About Sex Life
Share This: