Employment Law

by

In Delaney v. New York City Health & Hosps., 2024 NY Slip Op 32769(U), Index No. 525072/2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Kings Cty. August 2, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims of gender and race discrimination asserted under the New York State Human Rights Law. Plaintiff’s allegations included the following:…

Read More Race, Sex Discrimination Claims Sufficiently Alleged Against NYC Health & Hospitals
Share This:
by

In Douse v. Walmart, No. 24-cv-2541, 2024 WL 3744357 (E.D.Pa. August 9, 2024), the court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s age- and race-based claims of constructive discharge and hostile work environment asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). As to plaintiff’s discrimination/constructive…

Read More Race, Age Constructive Discharge and Hostile Work Environment Claims Sufficiently Alleged Against Walmart
Share This:
by

In DiLeo v. McDonough, Case No. 19-CV-2405 (FB) (MMH), 2024 WL 3758808 (E.D.N.Y. August 12, 2024), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim of gender discrimination asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: The familiar, three-part McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework governs Plaintiff’s…

Read More “Emotionally Taxing” Work Environment Nevertheless Did Not Give Rise to Title VII Sex Discrimination Claim
Share This:
by

In Rolley v. Modern Disposal Services, Inc. et al, 21-CV-1229-LJV, 2024 WL 3819410 (W.D.N.Y. August 14, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s hostile work environment sexual harassment claims asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: The defendants argue that Rolley’s hostile work environment…

Read More Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claim Survives Dismissal Against Modern Disposal Services
Share This:
by

In Palmer v. ECapital Corp. et al, 23 Civ. 4080 (DEH). 2024 WL 3794715 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s gender discrimination claims. In sum, plaintiff alleged that she was disparately treated as compared to her male predecessor, a male colleague who eventually replaced her, and male…

Read More Sex Discrimination Claims Asserted by Replaced Female CEO Survive Dismissal
Share This:
by

In Brunt-Piehler v. Absolute Software, Inc. et al, 6:16-CV-06313 EAW, 2024 WL 3765523 (W.D.N.Y. August 13, 2024), the court, inter alia, vacated a jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor on her retaliation claim under the New York State Human Rights Law. This decision is instructive as to the “protected activity” element of a retaliation claim. The…

Read More Retaliation Verdict Vacated, Absent Evidence of “Protected Activity”
Share This:
by

In Applewhite et al v. N.Y.C. Dept. of Education, 2024 WL 3718675 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2024), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s failure-to-accommodate religion claim. From the decision: A plaintiff bringing a Title VII religious discrimination claim for failure to accommodate must allege that she “(1) has a bona fide religious…

Read More Failure to Accommodate Religion Claim Dismissed, Absent Allegation of Conflict Between Religious Observance and Employment Requirement
Share This:
by

In Espinoza v. CGJC Holdings LLC d/b/a Joe and Pat’s Pizzeria and Restaurant et al, 23cv9133 (DLC), 2024 WL 3520662 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2024), the court, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s discrimination claim asserted under New York’s “lawful activities” discrimination law, Labor Law § 201-d. (The court did, however, deny defendants’ motion to dismiss…

Read More Instagram Post-Related Discrimination Claim, Asserted Under New York’s “Lawful Activities” Discrimination Law, Dismissed
Share This:
by

In Espinoza v. CGJC Holdings LLC d/b/a Joe and Pat’s Pizzeria and Restaurant et al, 23cv9133 (DLC), 2024 WL 3520662 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s retaliation claims asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the New York State and City Human…

Read More Retaliation Claims, Predicated on Sexual Harassment Complaint, Survive Dismissal
Share This:
by

In Espinoza v. CGJC Holdings LLC d/b/a Joe and Pat’s Pizzeria and Restaurant et al, 23cv9133 (DLC), 2024 WL 3520662 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2024), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s various discrimination claims asserted under federal law (namely, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities…

Read More Hostile Work Environment Claims Based on Race, Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Disability Survive Dismissal
Share This: