Dram Shop Act

Pospis Law PLLC green monogram logo Pospis Law PLLC green monogram logo

In Esposito v. Rail Bar & Grill Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 01198 (App. Div. 2nd Dept. Feb. 20, 2019), the court affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff’s claim under New York General Obligations Law § 11-101, a/k/a the Dram Shop Act. In sum, plaintiff alleged that the defendants served alcohol to the plaintiff’s assailants when…

Read More “Dram Shop Act” Claim Dismissal Affirmed
Share This:

Man wearing round glasses and bow tie Man wearing round glasses and bow tie

In Ricaurte v. Inwood Beer Garden & Bistro Inc., 2018 NY Slip Op 07242 (App. Div. 1st Dept. Oct. 30, 2018), the court held that the lower court should have granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff’s claim under New York’s Dram Shop Act, but that it should have denied it as to plaintiff’s…

Read More Negligence, But Not Dram Shop Act, Claim Survives Summary Judgment
Share This:

Smiling professional with bow tie in office Smiling professional with bow tie in office

In Tansey v. Coscia, 2015 NY Slip Op 31778(U) (Sup. Ct. Suffolk Cty., Sept. 21, 2015), the court denied the defendant bar’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s Dram Shop Act and negligent supervision claims. In this personal injury case, the plaintiff alleged that he was assaulted by another patron, defendant Nicholas Coscia, while inside defendant’s…

Read More Dram Shop Act Claim, Arising From Bar Patron Assault, Survives Summary Judgment
Share This:

Man in suit with red bow tie interviewed Man in suit with red bow tie interviewed

In Covert v. Wisla Corp. (App. Div. 2nd Dept. July 29, 2015), the court affirmed the Supreme Court’s decision granting plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint to add a cause of action alleging a violation of the Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101). From the decision: [W]here a plaintiff alleges that he or she was…

Read More Plaintiff Permitted to Amend Complaint to Add Dram Shop Act Claim
Share This:

Man wearing round glasses and bow tie Man wearing round glasses and bow tie

Sneider v. AB Green Gansevoort, decided by the Supreme Court, New York County on January 7, 2015, addresses the pleading requirements for a claim of civil battery, as well as the effect of a criminal conviction on subsequent litigation arising out of the same facts. The facts: On February 23, 2013, the plaintiff, a patron…

Read More Standard Hotel Biergarten Brawl Lawsuit Continues
Share This:

Manhattan skyline at sunset with Empire State Manhattan skyline at sunset with Empire State

In James v. Terrace Tavern, LLC, an upstate trial court dismissed plaintiff’s Dram Shop Act and negligence claims against defendant bar. In November 2011, Defendant Robert McKenzie shot plaintiff Donovan James. Prior to the shooting, McKenzie was sitting in defendant’s bar. Plaintiff sued under, inter alia, the Dram Shop Act, codified at General Obligations Law §…

Read More Court Dismisses Dram Shop Act and Negligence Claims in “Bar Shooting” Personal Injury Case
Share This:

Smiling man in suit and red striped tie Smiling man in suit and red striped tie

Manhattan nightlife can be extremely exciting (I’ve heard) – sometimes in a not-so-good way. Here and below is the complaint filed on October 27, 2014 by plaintiff Amanda Keisoglu against the Hotel Gansevoort and Marie Thys (among others). Plaintiff alleges that, on August 23-24, 2014 while partying with her friends, Thys “violently, forcefully, intentionally, and in…

Read More Stiletto Stab Lawsuit Against Hotel Gansevoort
Share This:

Dark green PL monogram logo Dark green PL monogram logo

Below is the lawsuit, captioned Scarimbolo v. The Dram Shop, Index No. 503141/2014, recently filed by “Sopranos” actor Adam Scarimbolo against The Dram Shop Bar and an as-yet unnamed bartender. Plaintiff alleges that, “while at the Dram Shop, several unruly and heavily intoxicated patrons became enraged and violent towards Plaintiff simply because a couple of women who had accompanied those…

Read More Beating of Actor Adam Scarimbolo Gives Rise to Lawsuit Against Brooklyn Bar
Share This:

Pospis Law, PLLC logo and address Pospis Law, PLLC logo and address

In Parker v. Dunn, the Supreme Court, Wayne County recently granted summary judgment for defendant Hazlitt’s 1852 Vineyards dismissing plaintiffs’ claims arising from a fatal motorcycle accident. The facts: The action arises from a motor vehicle accident which occurred on May 31, 2009, on State Route 414 in the Town of Hector, New York at approximately…

Read More Court Rejects Action Under “Dram Shop Act” Against Vineyard
Share This:
© 2026 Pospis Law, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.