Federal Tort Claims Act

by

Green quotation marks on black background Green quotation marks on black background

In Doe v. Hagenbeck et al., No. 13 CIV. 2802 AKH, 2015 WL 1611153 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 13, 2015), the Southern District of New York held that plaintiff, a West Point cadet, sufficiently alleged gender discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court cited numerous instances of inappropriate…

Read More West Point Cadet Sufficiently Alleges Equal Protection Gender Discrimination Claim
Share This:
by

Man in suit with red bow tie interviewed Man in suit with red bow tie interviewed

Last week in Millbrook v. United States (March 27, 2013), the U.S. Supreme Court (per Justice Thomas, writing for a unanimous Court) issued a decision broadly interpreting the Federal Tort Claims Act’s so-called “law enforcement proviso” codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h). Petitioner Kim Millbrook, a prisoner in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, alleged that…

Read More SCOTUS Broadly Interprets the Federal Tort Claims Act’s “Law Enforcement Proviso”
Share This:
© 2026 Pospis Law, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.