NYC Human Rights Law Geographic Applicability

by

Post thumbnail

In Pakniat v Moor et al, No. 160019/2019, 2020 WL 2198218 (N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County May 04, 2020), a sexual harassment case, the court held that the plaintiff did not satisfy the geographical requirements of the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. The facts, briefly: [P]laintiff lived and worked in Canada…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claims Dismissed; Geographical Requirements of NY State and City Human Rights Laws Not Satisfied
Share This:
by

Two superheroes fighting above city skyline Two superheroes fighting above city skyline

In Wang v. Air China Limited and LB Oceanfront Corp., 17-CV-6662, 2020 WL 1140458 (E.D.N.Y. March 9, 2020), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s sexual harassment claim. From the decision: After assessing the totality of the alleged conduct, the relevant factors, and the Second Circuit’s caution against “setting the…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claim Survives Summary Judgment
Share This:
by

Man in beige suit with colorful bow tie Man in beige suit with colorful bow tie

In Mejia v. White Plains Self Storage Corp., 2020 WL 247995 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2020), the court, inter alia, dismissed plaintiff’s employment discrimination claim asserted under the New York City Human Rights Law. The court based its decision as to that claim on the NYCHRL’s limited geographic applicability. The court summarized the law as follows:…

Read More NYC Human Rights Law’s Geographic Limitations Explained and Applied
Share This:
by

Man wearing suit and orange-striped bow tie Man wearing suit and orange-striped bow tie

In McKinney v. Quayshanna Tanner of Set and Service Resource et al, 2019 WL 3067116 (SDNY July 12, 2019), the court, inter alia, dismissed plaintiff’s claims under the New York City Human Rights Law. From the decision: The Court must dismiss Plaintiff’s NYCHRL claims. The NYCHRL does not apply to discriminatory acts that occurred outside…

Read More Court Dismisses NYCHRL Discrimination Claim Arising From Events Outside NYC
Share This:
by

New York City skyline at golden sunset New York City skyline at golden sunset

In Chau v. Granger Management LLC et al, 357 F. Supp. 3d 276, 2019 WL 120766 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2019), the court, inter alia, held that a non-NYC resident met the “geographic” requirement of the the NYC Human Rights Law (NYCHRL). The court explained the black-letter law: “In order for a nonresident to invoke the…

Read More Sexual Harassment Plaintiff Meets “Impact” Test of NYC Human Rights Law, Court Holds
Share This:
by

Starbucks cup beside clear tip box Starbucks cup beside clear tip box

A recent case, Amaya v. Ballyshear LLC, 2018 WL 6065493 (EDNY Nov. 20, 2018), discusses the geographical reach of the New York City Human Rights Law. In this case, the Plaintiff – a former housekeeper who lives in Southampton, New York – claims that defendants engaged in unlawful discrimination and retaliation in violation of the NYCHRL.…

Read More NYC Human Rights Law Claim Dismissed; “Impact” Not Felt in New York City
Share This:
by

Brooklyn Bridge with Manhattan skyline in background Brooklyn Bridge with Manhattan skyline in background

In Wolf v. Imus, 2018 NY Slip Op 51361(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Sept. 27, 2018) (J. d’Auguste), the court, inter alia, dismissed plaintiff’s (an 80 year-old Florida resident) age discrimination claims against radio personality Don Imus et al. This was based on both geography and the merits. Here is an excerpt from the decision: Due to…

Read More Florida Resident’s Discrimination Claims Against Imus Dismissed
Share This:
by

Yellow triangular wet floor caution sign Yellow triangular wet floor caution sign

In Giove v. City of New York, 15-cv-2998, 2018 WL 736008 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2018), the court addressed whether sexual orientation discrimination and retaliation claims brought by a teacher were barred by collateral estoppel due to a prior finding at a hearing pursuant to NY Education Law § 3020-a. Under the facts of this case, the…

Read More Sexual Orientation Discrimination & Retaliation Claims Not Barred By Adverse 3020-a Hearing Determination
Share This:
by

Pospis Law PLLC logo with New York address Pospis Law PLLC logo with New York address

A recent New York state court decision, Fernandez v. POP Displays & Active Staffing Services (NY Sup. Ct. NY Cty. 154516/2016 Jan. 5, 2017), illustrates the limitations on the geographic reach of the New York City Human Rights Law. The court granted defendant POP Display’s motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211(a)(2) for lack of subject…

Read More Court Dismisses NYC Human Rights Law Claims (Sexual Harassment Etc.) Against Non-NYC Company
Share This:
© 2026 Pospis Law, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.