Products Liability

by

Green intertwined P and L monogram Green intertwined P and L monogram

In Ingram v. Life Fitness, 2016 NY Slip Op 05085 (App. Div. 1st Dept. June 28, 2016), the court reversed a denial of summary judgment to defendants, and directed the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the complaint. In her complaint, plaintiff alleged that, while she was attempting to step on a treadmill – identified in the…

Read More Treadmill Injury Claim Dismissed; Plaintiff Assumed the Risk
Share This:
by

Tree roots lifting cracked residential sidewalk Tree roots lifting cracked residential sidewalk

Shawn Bickham just wanted a Coke. He got one from the fridge and started drinking. After he had finished about half the can, he “felt something get caught in his throat” which “felt like something poking and something just stuck, lodged [in his throat].” It turned out that the object was a non-metallic “dried, brittle…

Read More Case Arising From Ingestion of “Dried, Brittle Mass” From Coke Can Survives Summary Judgment Under “Res Ipsa Loquitur” Theory
Share This:
by

Green interlocking P and L monogram Green interlocking P and L monogram

Here is the complaint filed by William Mack against Lehigh Outfitters LLC and Rocky Brands Inc. Plaintiff, who is seeking $10 million, alleges that a defect in defendants’ shoe caused him to suffer damages. According to the New York Post article on the lawsuit: Transit veteran William Mack of Long Island is suing a footwear manufacturer…

Read More Toe Amputation Shoe Product Liability Lawsuit
Share This:
by

Man in beige suit with colorful bow tie Man in beige suit with colorful bow tie

As illustrated by a 1930 First Department products liability case, there are, apparently, worse things than shooting your eye out with a toy gun. Setting yourself on fire, for example. From Crist v. Art Metal Works, 230 A.D. 114, 116, 243 N.Y.S. 496, 497 (App. Div. 1930) aff’d, 255 N.Y. 624, 175 N.E. 341 (1931): Defendant…

Read More Toy Gun Danger
Share This:
by

Post thumbnail

In Reis v. Volvo Cars of N. Am., decided July 1, 2014, the Court of Appeals held that the trial court erroneously charged the jury in a design defect case, requiring reversal and a new trial. Here are the facts of this product liability case: On May 24, 2002, plaintiff’s friend, Americo Silva, was showing plaintiff…

Read More Inappropriate Jury Charge in Product Liability Case Results in Tossing of $10 Million Jury Verdict
Share This:
by

New York City skyline at sunset New York City skyline at sunset

Under New York law, a plaintiff suing a municipality (including the City of New York) must first file what is called a “Notice of Claim.” The particulars of the Notice of Claim requirement are spelled out in General Municipal Law § 50-e. In Jimenez v. City of New York, decided May 15, 2014, the Appellate Division, First…

Read More Notice of Claim Sufficiently Alleged Playground Equipment’s Defective Design
Share This:
© 2026 Pospis Law, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.