Sexual Harassment

by

In a lawsuit filed today in the Southern District of New York – captioned EEOC v. Hillcrest Marshall, Inc. d/b/a Dunkin’ Donuts, 15-07293 – plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleges that defendant (doing business as Dunkin’ Donuts) subjected female employees to sexual harassment, created a hostile work environment, and retaliated against an employee for opposing…

Read More Sexual Harassment/Hostile Work Environment Lawsuit Against Dunkin Donuts
Share This:
by

In Ingrassia v. Health & Hosp. Corp., No. 14 CV 1900 PKC, 2015 WL 5229444 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 8, 2015), the Eastern District of New York held that plaintiff plausibly alleged claims of sexual harassment/hostile work environment, retaliation, and constructive discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in…

Read More Hospital Worker Plausibly Alleges Hostile Work Environment/Sexual Harassment, Retaliation, and Constructive Discharge Claims
Share This:
by

In Rodriguez v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., No. 14 CIV. 4960 BMC, 2015 WL 5229850 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 8, 2015), the Eastern District of New York granted defendant summary judgment on plaintiff’s sexual orientation discrimination and quid pro quo sexual harassment claims. In sum, plaintiff alleged that “he was denied employment by defendants…

Read More Hiring of Better-Qualified Candidate, Notwithstanding “Unprofessional and Coarse” Text Messages, Defeats Sexual Orientation Discrimination (Failure-to-Hire) Claim
Share This:
by

In Phillips v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., 15 N.Y.S.3d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015), the Appellate Division, First Department  held that an arbitration award reinstating a sexual harassment offender (and union member) to his position pursuant to a Collective Bargaining Agreement was contrary to public policy. In sum, after a female bus…

Read More Sexual Harassment/Hostile Work Environment Offender Not Entitled to Reinstatement Under Collective Bargaining Agreement
Share This:
by

Here is the recently-filed lawsuit, Pantor v. City of New York and Green Key Resources (filed NY Cty. 9/9/15, Index # 159257/2015), in which plaintiff alleges that she was subjected to sexual harassment by her supervisor at the City of New York Office of the Actuary, and then retaliated against for rejecting his advances. Specifically,…

Read More Lawsuit Alleges Sexual Harassment at NYC Office of the Actuary
Share This:
by

In Fox v. New York City Dep’t of Educ., No. 13-CV-3204 VEC, 2015 WL 4991878 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2015), the court dismissed claims asserted by plaintiff – a former guidance counselor at P.S. 150 – of religious discrimination, race discrimination, age discrimination, hostile work environment, and sexual harassment. As to plaintiff’s religious discrimination claim, the court…

Read More Guidance Counselor’s Discrimination, Sexual Harassment Claims Dismissed
Share This:
by

In a lawsuit captioned Pollock v. Agrei Consulting, et al (NY Sup. Ct. Kings Cty. filed 9/4/15, Index # 510920/2015), plaintiff alleges that she was sexually harassed by her boss who she claims, among other things, sent her flirtatious and sexually inappropriate text messages (such as “You take good care of me and I will…

Read More Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Alleges That Boss Put Penis Pictures on Executive Assistant’s Computer
Share This:
by

In Ming v. A.E.G. Mgmt., No. 15-CV-643 JG, 2015 WL 5038222 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2015), the court dismissed plaintiff’s race discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Initially, the court held that “Ming’s complaint fails to state a claim under Title VII for discrimination on the basis of…

Read More Race Discrimination and Retaliation Claims Dismissed With Leave to Replead
Share This:
by

In Figueroa v. Johnson, 109 F. Supp. 3d 532 (EDNY 2015), the Eastern District of New York dismissed plaintiff’s “quid pro quo” sexual harassment claim due to lack of temporal proximity. The court explained: Under Title VII, a plaintiff may seek relief for sex discrimination under two theories: (1) quid pro quo or (2) hostile…

Read More Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment Claim Fails Where Too Much Time Passes Between the “Quid” and the “Quo”
Share This:
by

In EEOC v. Suffolk Laundry Services, 48 F.Supp.3d 497 (2014), the Eastern District of New York denied defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment on plaintiffs’ hostile work environment claims. (Here is the complaint and here is the EEOC press release about the lawsuit.) One point this decision makes is that “conduct directed at other employees is part of the…

Read More “Hostile Work Environment” Can Be Shown By Conduct Directed at Other Employees
Share This: