Smiling man with round glasses and striped bowtie
In Thomas v. The Arbor Co., No. CV 26-CV-0149, 2026 WL 1329832 (E.D. Pa. May 13, 2026), the court, inter alia, held that plaintiff failed to sufficiently allege a hostile work environment claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: to plead a hostile work environment claim, a plaintiff…
Read More Title VII Hostile Work Environment Claim Dismissed
Man wearing round glasses and striped bow tie
In White v. Harvard Security, LLC, No. 25-CV-0622, 2026 WL 1413549 (E.D. Pa. May 19, 2026), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s race-based hostile work environment claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: Title VII provides in relevant part that, “it shall be…
Read More Title VII Race-Based Hostile Work Environment Claim Dismissed
Manhattan skyline at sunrise
In Sylvester v. Louisiana State University Agricultural & Mechanical College Board of Supervisors, No. 6:24-CV-01114, 2026 WL 1389854 (W.D. La. May 18, 2026), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s hostile work environment sexual harassment claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision:…
Read More Title VII Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claim Dismissed; Single Incident Was Insufficiently “Severe”
Galvanized conduit coupling with set screws
In Magassouba v. Prince George’s County, Maryland et al, No. 8:23-CV-00767-TJS, 2026 WL 1396051 (D. Md. May 19, 2026), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for judgment, renewed motion for judgment, or in the alternative, motion for a new trial, following a jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor on his retaliation claim under Title VII…
Read More Court Upholds Jury Verdict for Plaintiff on Retaliatory Hostile Work Environment Claim Galvanized conduit coupling with set screws
In Brown v. CBS News, Inc., No. 152570/2025, 2026 WL 1348982 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. May 10, 2026), the court, inter alia, summarized and applied the law governing the geographic applicability of the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. It summarized the black-letter law as follows: The NYSHRL and NYCHRL each separately prohibit employment…
Read More Court Dismisses NYS and NYC Human Rights Law Claims on Subject Matter Jurisdiction Grounds; Relevant Conduct Occurred Outside New York
Pospis Law PLLC logo
In Davis v. Wawa, No. 25-2550, 2026 WL 1298513 (3d Cir. May 12, 2026), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a lower court’s order granting summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claim of hostile work environment sexual harassment. From the decision: To establish a hostile work environment claim based on sexual harassment, a…
Read More Title VII Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Dismissal Affirmed; Single Touching Incident Insufficient Manhattan skyline at sunrise
In Damptey v. Truist Bank, No. 6:26-CV-00050, 2026 WL 1358740 (W.D. Va. May 14, 2026), the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint alleging a race-based hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This decision illustrates the context-specific analysis required in these types of cases. From…
Read More Title VII Race-Based Hostile Work Environment Claim Dismissed; Alleged Use of Term “Cotton Picking” Insufficient
Man in suit with red bow tie interviewed
In Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm’n v. FCA US, L.L.C., No. 25-CV-10174, 2026 WL 1333761 (E.D. Mich. May 13, 2026), the court, inter alia, held that plaintiff sufficiently alleged a sex-based hostile work environment claim in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and therefore denied defendant’s motion to dismiss and/or for…
Read More Title VII Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claim, Based on Alleged Touching, Leering, and Sexual Comments Survives Dismissal
Pospis Law PLLC green monogram logo
In Quintinar v. New York State Office of the Attorney General et al, No. 160721/22, 2026 WL 1291362 (N.Y. App. Div. May 12, 2026), the court held that plaintiff sufficiently alleged claims of, inter alia, sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. From the decision: Plaintiff…
Read More Sex Discrimination and Retaliation Claims, Arising From Alleged Sexual Assault at Political Fundraising Event, Survive Dismissal
Black metal fire escapes on beige apartment building
In Farmer v. Mizuho Securities USA LLC, No. 151348/24, 2026 WL 1291338 (N.Y. App. Div. May 12, 2026), the New York Appellate Division, First Department reversed the lower court’s decision, and reinstated plaintiff’s claims of gender discrimination and hostile work environment under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. From the decision: Plaintiff’s…
Read More Applying the Continuing Violation Doctrine, the First Department Reinstates NYS & NYC Human Rights Law Gender Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment Claims