Blog

In Chislett v. New York City Department of Education, No. 24-972-cv, 2025 WL 2725669 (2d Cir. Sept. 25, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, inter alia, vacated the lower court’s award of summary judgment on plaintiff’s race-based hostile work environment claim. As it was undisputed that plaintiff subjectively perceived the environment…

Read More Race-Based Hostile Work Environment Claim Survives Summary Judgment Against the NYC Department of Education
Share This:

In Kelly v. Rosenberg & Estis, P.C. et al, 25-cv-4776 (CM), 2025 WL 2709157 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2025), the court, inter alia, held that the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021  (EFAA) applied to plaintiff’s entire case – which included her allegations of sexual harassment – and thus denied…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claim Made Out Under NYCHRL; EFAA Applied to Entire Case; Motion to Compel Arbitration Denied
Share This:

In Clermont v. OTG Concessions Management LLC, 24-cv-6590 (BMC), 2025 WL 2664022 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 17, 2025), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim of retaliation asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. From the decision: To state a claim for retaliation under Section 1981, a plaintiff must plead: “(i) she engaged in…

Read More Section 1981 Retaliation Claim Survives Dismissal
Share This:

In Clermont v. OTG Concessions Management LLC, 24-cv-6590 (BMC), 2025 WL 2664022 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 17, 2025), the court, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim of race discrimination asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. In sum, plaintiff, a Hispanic woman who worked as a JFK Airport barista, alleged (among other things) that her…

Read More Hispanic JFK Barista Sufficiently Alleges Race Discrimination Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Share This:

The term “hate speech” is a common fixture in modern discourse, often used to describe offensive, bigoted, or hateful expression. But what is its legal standing in the United States? The answer, as many First Amendment scholars will tell you, is far from simple. In short, there is no legal definition of “hate speech” in…

Read More The First Amendment and “Hate Speech”: A Complex Legal Landscape
Share This:

In Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp. doing business as Dominos Pizza, 2025 WL 2663170 (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 17, 2025), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim of sexual harassment asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This decision illustrates that even “inappropriate behavior” may fall below…

Read More Title VII Sexual Harassment Claim, Based on “Inappropriate” Comments, Dismissed
Share This:

As a plaintiff-side employment lawyer in New York, I’ve heard it all. From whispers in the breakroom to explosive arguments in a manager’s office, the stories of “workplace drama” are as varied as the clients who share them. But here’s the truth: what many people dismiss as mere “drama” can actually be a sign of…

Read More Navigating the Storm: A Plaintiff-Side Employment Lawyer’s Guide to “Workplace Drama”
Share This:

In Pullman et al v. Collins et al, No. 24-CV-1383 (KMK), 2025 WL 2673807 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 2025), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss a plaintiff’s claim of hostile work environment sexual harassment asserted under the New York State Human Rights Law. From the decision: Next, Defendants argue that Dinsmore has failed…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claim Sufficiently Alleged Under Recently-Amended NYS Human Rights Law, Court Holds
Share This:

In Mimitz v. Safe Haven Security Services, LLC, 2025 WL 2650441 (Conn.Super. Sept. 9, 2025), the court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s hostile work environment sexual harassment claim. From the decision: The defendant moves for summary judgment on the ground that there exists no genuine issue of material fact as to the…

Read More Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claim Dismissed; Alleged “Vulgar” Language Insufficient
Share This:

In Laporte, Jose v. Sullivan, Brian, 1:24-cv-1124 (ECC/DJS), 2025 WL 2645531 (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 15, 2025), the court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s – a dark-skinned Hispanic man – claim of race/national origin discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C § 1983. From the decision: Plaintiff argues…

Read More Upstate Hispanic Correction Officer Sufficiently Alleges Race & National Origin Discrimination
Share This: