Blog

by

Green stylized P and L monogram logo Green stylized P and L monogram logo

In Trump v. CASA, Inc., 2025 WL 1773631 (U.S. 2025), the U.S. Supreme Court ended the so-called “universal injunction” – here, an order issued by a single U.S. District Court to stop nationwide implementation of an Executive Order. While this case arose from challenges to the president’s Executive Order ending “birthright citizenship,” this decision does…

Read More U.S. Supreme Court Limits “Universal Injunctions” in “Birthright Citizenship” Case
Share This:
by

Woolworth Building skyscraper in Manhattan Woolworth Building skyscraper in Manhattan

In Anderson v. The City of New York, No. 155791/2023, 2025 WL 1756499 (N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County June 25, 2025), the court, inter alia, plaintiff did not state a cause of action for retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law. From the decision: In his second cause of action, plaintiff brings…

Read More Retaliation Claim Dismissed; Complying With Drug Screening Was Not “Protected Activity” Under The NYC Human Rights Law
Share This:
by

Aluminum A-frame step ladder Aluminum A-frame step ladder

In Collins, Sam v. Federal Express Corporation, 2025 WL 1764809 (2d Cir. June 26, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, inter alia, affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s hostile work environment claims as being time-barred. From the decision: We also agree that Collins’ hostile-work-environment claims are time-barred. A hostile work…

Read More Hostile Work Environment Claims Against FedEx Properly Dismissed as Time-Barred, 2nd Circuit Holds
Share This:
by

Smiling man in suit and red striped tie Smiling man in suit and red striped tie

In Cherner v. CF Bankshares Inc., 24-CV-02812 (PMH), 2025 WL 1745864 (S.D.N.Y. June 23, 2025), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s gender discrimination claim asserted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the decision: Title VII “makes actionable any form of sex-based compensation discrimination.” Lenzi v. Systemax,…

Read More Male Plaintiff Sufficiently Alleges Gender Discrimination Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Share This:
by

Pospis Law PLLC law firm logo Pospis Law PLLC law firm logo

In Simmons v. Baccarat Inc., No. 651516/2023, 2025 WL 1735659 (N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County June 23, 2025), the court, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims of hostile work environment and sexual harassment under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. From the decision: The Moving Defendants correctly assert…

Read More Hostile Work Environment, Sexual Harassment Claims Dismissed; Evidence Indicated That Plaintiff Participated in “Sexually Themed” Text Messages
Share This:
by

Panoramic Manhattan skyline at sunrise Panoramic Manhattan skyline at sunrise

In Winfrey v. The City of New York, No. 160719/2024, 2025 WL 1446806 (N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County May 20, 2025), the court, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims of race discrimination under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. From the decision: To plead a prima facie case…

Read More Race Discrimination Claims Dismissed; Alleged Alcohol Consumption on Duty, Rather Than Race, Was Basis For Termination
Share This:
by

Smiling man in suit with striped yellow tie Smiling man in suit with striped yellow tie

In Kay v. Banchik, No. 654454/2023, 2025 WL 1707867 (N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County June 17, 2025), the court, inter alia, held that plaintiff failed to state age and gender discrimination claims under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. From the decision: Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s remaining allegations for failure…

Read More Age, Sex Discrimination Claims, Asserted Under the NYS and NYC Human Rights Laws, Dismissed
Share This:
by

Green overlapping P and L monogram logo Green overlapping P and L monogram logo

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, Fla., 2025 WL 1716138 (U.S. June 20, 2025), the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and addressed the question of whether that statute “reaches discrimination against retirees who neither hold nor desire a job whose essential tasks they can perform with reasonable accommodation.” The Court…

Read More Supreme Court: Retiree’s ADA Disability Discrimination Claim Properly Dismissed
Share This:
by

Sign on bar door refusing service to anyone Sign on bar door refusing service to anyone

In Kapllanaj v. Healthfirst PHSP, Inc., No. 152720/2021, 2025 WL 1707852 (N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County June 17, 2025), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s retaliation claims asserted under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. From the decision: The branch of the motion for summary…

Read More Retaliation Claims Against Healthfirst Survive Summary Judgment
Share This:
by

Man in suit with pink bow tie Man in suit with pink bow tie

In Kapllanaj v. Healthfirst PHSP, Inc., No. 152720/2021, 2025 WL 1707852 (N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County June 17, 2025), the court, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s gender discrimination and hostile work environment claims asserted under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. The court summarized the facts…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claims Against Healthfirst Survive Summary Judgment
Share This:
© 2026 Pospis Law, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.