Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (EFAA)

In Yost v. Everyrealm, Inc. et al, No. 22 Civ. 6549 (PAE), 2023 WL 2224450 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2023), the court, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s sexual harassment claim asserted under the (extremely lenient) New York City Human Rights Law. After summarizing the “black letter” law pertaining to this claim, the court…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claims Dismissed Notwithstanding Alleged “Sexual Gossip”
Share This:

In Walters v. Starbucks Corp. et al, 2022 WL 3684901 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2022), the court held that the plaintiff’s sexual harassment claim was subject to mandatory arbitration. The court explained: Walters argues that federal law prohibits, rather than requires, the enforcement of the Arbitration Agreement. Under the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claims Against Starbucks Must Be Arbitrated, Court Holds
Share This:

In Steinberg v. Capgemini America, Inc., 2022 WL 3371323 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 16, 2022), the court granted defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and dismiss plaintiff’s complaint alleging sexual harassment, in light of an arbitration agreement between the parties. The crux of the parties’ dispute was the applicability of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and…

Read More Sexual Harassment Claims Against Capgemini Must Be Resolved in Arbitration; Arbitration-Limiting Statute Inapplicable
Share This: